Strict Deterministic Aspects of Minimalist Grammars
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Minimalist Grammars (MGs) proposed by Stabler(1997) have tree-shaped derivations (Harkema, 2001b; Michaelis, 2001a). As in categorial grammars, each lexical item is an association between a vocabulary element and complex of features, and so the “yields” or “fringes” of the derivation trees are sequences of these lexical items, and the string parts of these lexical items are reordered in the course of the derivation. This paper shows that while the derived string languages can be ambiguous and non-context-free, the set of yields of the derivation trees is always context-free and unambiguous. In fact, the derivation yield languages are strictly deterministic context-free languages, which implies that they are LR(0), and that the generation of derivation trees from a yield language string can be computed in linear time. This result suggests that the work of MG parsing consists essentially of guessing the lexical entries associated with words and empty categories.
منابع مشابه
Semantic Aspects of Minimalist Grammars
Minimalist grammars are a rich lexicalized syntactic formalism which inherits the depth and wide covering of the generative tradition. Nevertheless up to now there is no straightforward way to extract the predicative structure of a sentence from syntactic analyses and from the predicative structure of the lexical items. In this paper we try to apply to this richer syntactic model the traditiona...
متن کاملLocality Conditions and the Complexity of Minimalist Grammars: A Preliminary Survey
Among the well-established variety of formal grammar types providing a mildly context-sensitive grammar (MCSG) formalism in the sense of Joshi (1985), Stabler’s minimalist grammars (MGs) (Stabler 1997, 1999) come closest to modeling the tools used in the Chomskyan branch of generative syntax known as “minimalism” (Chomsky 1995, 2000, 2001). Interestingly, without there being a rise in (at least...
متن کاملA Note on Countercyclicity and Minimalist Grammars
Minimalist grammars (MGs), as introduced in Stabler (1997), have proven a useful instrument in the formal analysis of syntactic theories developed within the minimalist branch of the principles–and–parameters framework (cf. Chomsky 1995, 2000). In fact, as shown in Michaelis (2001), MGs belong to the class of mildly context–sensitive grammars. Interestingly, without there being a rise in (at le...
متن کاملA Single Movement Normal Form for Minimalist Grammars
Movement is the locus of power in Minimalist grammars (MGs) but also their primary source of complexity. In order to simplify future analysis of the formalism, we prove that every MG can be converted into a strongly equivalent MG where every phrase moves at most once. The translation procedure is implemented via a deterministic linear tree transduction on the derivation tree language and induce...
متن کامل(Multimodal) Categorial Grammar and Minimalist Program: some reflexions and comparisons
Several proposals have been made in order to implement some aspects of the Minimalist Program (and among them Stabler’s minimalist grammars) logically. Among these proposals, we compare W.Vermaat’s thesis and a previous paper of the author. Then we confront these works with the new perspective brought by Lecomte and Retoré, which seems to gain in clarity by separating the syntactic and the sema...
متن کامل